Skip to main content

41 Posts in 14 Topics by 11 members

Facilitators

Page: 1 , Go to End
Author Topic: FMIC Case Study 2 1 Views

FMIC Case Study 2

Hi friends, this is what I have found checking the distance learning resources and other resources. I do appreciate all the work that has gone into producing there trainee resource booklets & facilitator manuals for us, I know it was a huge project. It may be just with this discussion board and COPS we can finally iron out any misunderstandings or mistakes. Client 2 (Family) Their version 1 budget (although the name on budget is showing as Client F) in Trainee resource module 7 page 23 (note same amount for this couple as is given for Client 1 who is a single parent - or does a mum and child qualify for the couple allowance of WEP? Client 2 (Family) their version 2 budget (again the name on budget is showing as Client F) in Trainee resource module 8 page 41 & repeated in Facilitator manual module 8 page 31 and in DL module 8 page 45 where the name on the budget is now Client A   Client 2 (Family) CASHFLOW - the benefit & WEP income have their cents amount dropped on the cashflow written see Trainee resource module 8 page 58 & on module 8 slides and in DL module 8 pages 60 - 62 written from this version 2 budget (not sure how I feel about that being done would like to discuss this with other facilitators). Note: The 13 week Temporary Assistance Supplement is shown as full amount on their V2 budget, unlike the temporary WEP  
    1 Views
Go to Top