41 Posts in 14 Topics by 11 members
Facilitators
| Page: 1 , | Go to End | |
| Author | Topic: FMIC Case Study 2 | 1 Views |
FMIC Case Study 2
Jul 28, 2022, 5:39 PM Last edited: April 15, 2026 at 3:53 PM at 3:53:18 PM
Hi friends, this is what I have found checking the distance learning resources and other resources. I do appreciate all the work that has gone into producing there trainee resource booklets & facilitator manuals for us, I know it was a huge project. It may be just with this discussion board and COPS we can finally iron out any misunderstandings or mistakes.
Client 2 (Family) Their version 1 budget (although the name on budget is showing as Client F) in Trainee resource module 7 page 23 (note same amount for this couple as is given for Client 1 who is a single parent - or does a mum and child qualify for the couple allowance of WEP?
Client 2 (Family) their version 2 budget (again the name on budget is showing as Client F) in Trainee resource module 8 page 41 & repeated in
Facilitator manual module 8 page 31 and in
DL module 8 page 45 where the name on the budget is now Client A
Client 2 (Family) CASHFLOW - the benefit & WEP income have their cents amount dropped on the cashflow written see Trainee resource module 8 page 58 & on
module 8 slides and in
DL module 8 pages 60 - 62
written from this version 2 budget (not sure how I feel about that being done would like to discuss this with other facilitators).
Note: The 13 week Temporary Assistance Supplement is shown as full amount on their V2 budget, unlike the temporary WEP
| 1 Views | ||
| Go to Top |